EVE and the Apple

Damn son, it's been a while and...not all that much has happened. In gaming news, I still don't care about Halo ODST, the Microsoft Surface (I'll probably talk about the surface at length however) or whatever the hell Sony thinks they're doing (landing planes by the looks of their latest foray into gimmicky motion control). Granted there are some things I am genuinely excited for, Left 4 Dead 2, DeadSpace Extraction, Assassin's Creed 2, Champions Online spring to mind.
Apple of course have released the latest flavor of iPhones, Macbooks, and operating systems, however I have an iPod Touch, iMac, and Leopard to do those things. (not to say that I'm not on awe of the newest capabilities of the iPhone.
Perhaps it's a sign of the, shall we say, drought of new actually good games, but I have found myself spending hour after hour playing the most boring game I can possibly think of, EVE online (or Spread-Sheet Commander as I call it), and actually enjoying every moment of it. If you don't know what EVE is, don't fret neither does anyone else, just look it up. To give you an idea of the absolutely riveting experiences I have been enjoying for the past week; my character, Scott Thaen, an aspiring entrepreneur turned asteroid miner has been learning such skills as Signature Analasys, Astrogeology, and Mining Laser operation. My days have been consumed by trade runs between asteroid belts rich in omber ore and the local refinery station. When I get enough omber ore from mining the asteroids,roughly 990m³, I take it to the station and, rather than refining it, sell it to some poor sap who is buying it for 15% higher than the regional average.
But I digress. For the most part, my time has been consumed anxiously awaiting my new speakers, a pair of KRK RP5 monitors. My current built-ins simply don't do DeadSpace justice.
Like I said earlier, this may be a sign of the sorry state of game development over the last few months. "But hold on a minute, X, and Y and Z, and the expansion to A¹ all came out for the PS3 exclusively" you may say to me. Even if I gave a shit about what comes out for the PS3, I'll be damned if any of those aforementioned mathematical terms were any good to play. Point being, back in the day (late 1990's) anyone with a computer and an ability to code and draw 2D sprites worth a damn had his own game company. Black Isle, Interplay, The Digital Village, the old (and good) Bungie, Core Design, Ambrosia Software. All of them made fantastic games and you get 10 internets if you can think of any games they made without resorting to Wikipedia, and no, baby's first FPS, Halo, doesn't count. All of the games that came out of that era seemed to be made for the fun of it, rather than to please the investors or the whiny, bitchy fanboys. These days however, game development has boiled down to a shadowy council of mega-corporations, EA games, Ubisoft, Activion-Blizzard, Atari, and 2K Games. They seem to oversee the last dregs of real game developers that harken back to the good 'ol days like Blizzard (pre-Activion Merger) and Valve Soft.
My point is that I'm getting sick of playing as Blood Slaughter, the "emotionally involving" Space Marine, or as Jimmy Cale, the "emotionally involving" good 'ol American hero, fighting those commy bastards, the Nazis in their doom fortresses. I'm not tired of playing as Faith the "emotionally one-sided" and running across buildings being chased by Johnny Law however, or as Gordon Freeman, the "emotionally anonymous" killing aliens in arguably one of the best video game stories ever. I suppose it's time I reach a point. What I'm saying is that I'm tired of playing games for the sake of playing games. Honestly I'd rather see a game take 2 years to complete and have Corporal Blood Slaughter be an emotionally involving character, especially when he has to choose how do brutalize his family. I realize that that my contradict what I've been saying for the past 3 paragraphs, but all that I see in the future are more cookie-cutter sequels to fairly generic FPSs' and variations to sudoku and mah jong from the indie crowd.

Mirror, mirror on the wall...

     So about a week ago I was called down to the Apple stor to pick up my brand-new 24" iMac as a replacement for the other, olser, one that shat itself a few days prior. Being a gamer my first concern was the power of the  Nvidia Geforce 120 that was embeded. This proved not to be a problem as it performed superbly well in Mirror's Edge, running at a constant 30 or so frames-per-second with all my settings maxed out. 

   This convinced me to replay the game, and so in leu of sleeping I beat the game a second time, on hard, in one sitting. Finding myself exceptionally bored afterword I decided to look up all of the Mirror's edge related stuff I could find. 

    I soon stubled onto Lazygamer.co.za and read their review of the console version of the game and one line stuck out in perticular, "Mirror’s Edge is by no means a graphical marvel, and in certain aspects definitely doesn’t make full use of the Unreal 3 Engine which it is built on"

     If that's the case I would really like to know waht a graphical marvel is, and no, I really don't think that Crysis really counts.

      In my opinion, Mirror's Edge is the best looking game of 2008. Bias as that my be I think it does in fact look better than Crysis in most situations.  (By the way, I'm not taking gamplay or difficuly into account).

       Don't get me wrong , Crysis is very impressive, but to me it's graphical shortcomings become apparent much more quickly then do ME's . One issue that pops out at me is that, Crysis was designed to look as though it is being viewed through a camera or regenerative nanosuit visor, while Me was intended to look as though you, the player was looking through your very own eyes. Yes things like sunrays, evtreme HDR, and excessive Motion Blur do look very cool and impressive, they don't really give the realistic impression that many people credit them with.

        Say what you will about how I'm a fucking idiot who has kno fucking idea about what he's talking about because he's a retard who can't play Crysis on maximum settings and still be able to play at 60 FPS because he's a fucking dumbass who can't afford an $X,000,000 computer to play it on, but i still feel that Mirror's Edge looks better.

         What I really want to know though is, what do you think?